|
Post by juthi52943 on Jan 4, 2024 7:16:06 GMT 3
Art GDPR The court also indicated that in the case in question there is a convergence of grounds for liability for compensation for nonpecuniary damage pursuant to Art. section of the GDPR and compensation for harm nonpecuniary damage caused by the violation of the plaintiffs personal rights the right to privacy in the field of informational autonomy as to the decision to disclose information about oneself under Art. CC in connection with joke. CC in connection with joke. CC Free Job Function Email List knowledge about GDPR. Use as much as you want! Webinars, articles, guides, training, snapshots and help. Welcome to the ODO knowledge base.IM INTO THISThe court mentioned that in terms of determining nonpecuniary damage under Art. section GDPR and nonpecuniary damage under Art. of the Civil Code in connection with joke. of the Civil Code arising from the same event the Defendant. Company making available a file with the to an unauthorized person, took into account that the Defendant Company, after causing this nonpecuniary damage, took a number of deliberate actions to remove the effects of this damage and prevent further increase in the scope this nonpecuniary damage, including notified the Complainant about the breach of her personal data.
|
|